The NSSF Act 2013 - What employers and employees need to know!

President Uhuru Kenyatta assented to the National Social Security Fund Act, 2013 (Act No 45 of 2013) on 24 December 2013. The Act commenced on 10 January 2014.

The Act introduces a Pension Fund and a Provident Fund, provides for contributions to the fund and benefits to be paid out of the fund.

The Act introduces a progressive, wider scope and portable social security system. It also provides for the closure of the old social security system within 5 years.

Download the full Tax Alert below:





East African Tax Consulting
Mobile: +254 722 332729
Email: starlings@taxeac.com
Contacts: Starlings Muchiri, Samuel Karanja

NHIF Contributions - New hurdles arise in the implementation of enhanced rates!

On 11 September 2014, NHIF management and COTU officials agreed on new rates of contribution. COTU also agreed to withdraw their outstanding court case.

PUSETU however rejected the rates and threatened to move to court to stop the implementation of the agreed rates.

In the meantime, we advice employers to continue deducting contributions at the old rates and remitting the same to NHIF by 9th of the following month, pending a conclusive notice by NHIF.

See below for details:



East African Tax Consulting
Tel: +254 722 332729
Email: starlings@taxeac.com
Contacts: Starlings Muchiri, Samuel Karanja

Changes brought by the Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act 2014

The VAT Amendment Act was published on 15 May 2014 and commenced on 29 May 2014. See a list of the supplies that were affected by the Amendment Act below:

Will Ebola spoil the Party? – Effects on tax revenues from international flights.

Will Ebola spoil the Party? – Effects on tax revenues from international flights.

The recent Ebola outbreak in West Africa has drawn comparisons to the bubonic plague (Black Death) that ravaged Europe in the 14^th century. Statistically though, the fatalities are nowhere near those of the Black Death.

The Black Death by Nicholas Poussin
The ‘Black Death’ killed 30% of Europe’s population whereas Ebola has killed 1400 people

The thought of an Ebola Pandemic is scary because of the potential effects on the modern globalized economy.

Kenya banned flights from Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia from entering into the country. Many other airlines also stopped flying to the affected countries.

Let us have a look at the effect of the ban on flights from affected West African countries on tax revenue collections.

The tax Practice

There are two broad bilateral approaches to taxation of shipping lines and airlines in international traffic.

In the first approach, profits from the operation of ships and aircraft in international traffic are taxable only in the Contracting State in which the place of effective management of the enterprise is situated. This is the approach favoured by the OECD.

The second approach is recommended by the UN Model Tax Treaty to allow countries with undeveloped shipping industries to have a piece of the tax revenue pie. Profits from the operation of aircraft in international traffic are taxable only in the Contracting State in which the place of effective management of the enterprise is situated. However, the profits relating to the operation of ships in international traffic may be taxed at a reduced rate of tax in the second state if the operations in that second state are more than casual.

Liberia with over 3,500 ships has the second largest shipping registry after Panama. Liberia has shipping treaties with USA and New Zealand. The country also has double tax treaties with Germany and Sweden.

Sierra Leone has double tax treaties with Norway, South Africa and UK while Guinea has a double tax treaty with France.

Most countries unilaterally tax ships and aircraft in international traffic. In the case of Kenya, the unilateral rate of tax is 2.5% of the gross revenue from cargo, mail and passenger traffic sourced in Kenya.

The tax revenue losers

In view of the above tax practices in international shipping and air transport, countries affected by Ebola as well as countries that have banned flights into/from the affected regions will suffer direct revenue loss.

Closer home, Kenya Airways (KQ) derives around 25% of its revenues from West Africa.  Out of the 44 weekly flights to West Africa before the ban, 7 were to the affected countries.  KQ made losses in the last two years (KShs 3B last year and KShs 7.8B in the preceding year) for reasons not related to the Ebola outbreak.

The outbreak is likely to delay KQ’s return to profitability and tax contribution to the exchequer especially if the ban is extended over a long time or to other West African destinations.

 

At a recent press conference Titus Naikuni the outgoing KQ CEO mentioned that revenues from West Africa are not more than 25% 

Kenya Airports Authority (KAA) collects US $ 40 for every passenger who lands at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA).  Further, KAA collects airplane landing fees. KAA will lose on revenues that would have been paid by the passengers and airplanes from the banned routes.

Korean Airlines of South Korea suspended operations from Kenya stating that as a regional hub, Kenya has a high risk of exposure to Ebola. Again, this ripple effect leads to loss of revenue for KAA.

The silver lining

Is there a silver lining to this dark cloud?

The outbreak possibly gives the smaller regional aviation players a chance to grow their market share on the routes that have been shunned by the major airlines.

Charter flights (“the taxis of the sky”) are also likely to gain more prominence in the transportation of key personnel and cargo to the affected areas.

The Ebola outbreak will lead to tax revenue losses for the affected countries as well as the international transportation industry in general. The losses will be substantial if the outbreak becomes a pandemic or takes a long time to fizzle out. Hopefully national authorities and the international community will contain the outbreak before much damage is done.    

East African Tax Consulting

iTAX rolled out - How to file returns and make payments

Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) has rolled out the iTAX online tax return filing and payment system for domestic taxes. With effect from 1^st March 2014 all taxpayers are required to file their returns through iTAX. KRA will not accept manual returns. In addition, taxpayers using the Integrated Tax Management System (ITMS) are expected to upgrade to iTAX.

Getting started...

• Access the ipage through the web portal Click here 
• Log in to iTAX using existing ITMS credentials
• Update the profile data in iTAX
• Obtain the updated tax certificate

How to file returns... 

        

How to pay taxes...

Resurrection of Capital Gains Tax (CGT) in Kenya

Government's position

In June 2013, Henry Rotich, cabinet secretary for Kenya’s National Treasury, informed the Budget and Appropriations Committee of the National Assembly that the government had initiated a review of the capital gains tax under the Income Tax Act as part of a plan to reintroduce the CGT, which had been suspended more than 25 years earlier.

The cabinet secretary recently disclosed that the government has firmly committed to the international financial institutions to reintroduce CGT, at least on real estate. 

CGT suspended in 1985

While the charging section for the CGT (section 3(2)(f) of the ITA) is still in force, the operation of the eighth schedule to the ITA, under which capital gains are computed, was suspended in 1985 to spur investment in the capital markets and the real estate sector.

The easiest way to reintroduce the CGT would be to lift the suspension on the eighth schedule to the ITA. Alternatively, the government might introduce new regulations that are in line with current policy but incorporate recent trends in taxation.

Following is an outline of the provisions of the suspended legislation.

Rates of CGT

CGT is levied at the rate of 10 percent of net gains. However, capital gains from marketable securities held by individuals and listed on the securities exchange are taxed at 7.5 percent.

Subsection 3(2)(f) (capital gains) of the ITA is a fallback provision. Income is taxed under subsection 3(2)(f) only if it is not taxable under any other provision of the ITA. 

For example, if a taxpayer is engaged in the trade of buying and selling property, the resulting gains are taxed as business profits under subsection 3(2)(a). Depreciable capital machinery subject to balancing charges or deductions is not subject to CGT.

Who pays CGT?

Corporate and non-corporate persons (individuals and partnerships) both are subject to CGT, as are membership clubs and trade associations. 

The scope for CGT is wider for corporate organizations than individuals, however. For corporate entities, the CGT applies to real property, movable property, goods, money, and rights to property, whether the property is part of the business assets or is held for investment purposes. 

Individuals pay the tax only on gains from real property and marketable securities.

If property is held by trustees, nominees, or liquidators, they have the obligation to account for tax on any gains arising from the transfer of the property.

Subject matter

Land is defined widely to include buildings, standing timber, trees, crops, and land covered by water.

Capital gains are taxed at source. Marketable securities issued by the government, a municipal authority, or government authority are deemed to be situated in the country in which the authority is situated. 

Other marketable securities are deemed to be situated in the country where they are registered or where the principal register is located.

The taxable value for CGT purposes is the transfer value less the adjusted cost. The gain or loss is deemed to be realized at the time of the transfer even if the consideration is paid in installments.

The adjusted cost includes acquisition and construction costs, the cost of enhancing or preserving the value of the property, incidental costs, and the cost of defending title to the property. Incidental costs include legal fees; stamp duty; mortgage costs; and sales, advertising, and valuation costs.

Bad debts incurred in connection with the transfer of property can be deducted against trading income. 

CGT trigger 

A transfer occurs when a property is sold, exchanged, lost, abandoned, surrendered, or given as a gift, whether for consideration or not. There is no transfer if property is used to secure a debt, a company issues its own shares/debentures, or property is transmitted to heirs or is vested by a trustee to the beneficiary.

The tax authority may adjust the transfer price if it is not at arm’s length, if no consideration was paid, or if the consideration cannot be valued. In those cases, the market value is deemed to be the transfer price.

Transfers involving the exchange of properties necessitated by corporate restructuring and reorganizations are exempt from CGT subject to government approval.

Implications

The reintroduction of the CGT will undoubtedly cause investors to look for tax planning alternatives, including the recently introduced real estate investment trust regime and succession planning.

by Starlings Muchiri

Visit our website

Kenya at 50 years – evolution of the tax system

Kenya celebrated 50 years of independence from British colonial rule on 12 December 2013.

We look at the history of tax developments in the five decades from independence and highlight the areas for further reform.

The independence 60s

At independence, Kenya adopted the colonial legislation, international treaties and agreements that the British Crown had undertaken on behalf of the colony. The tax system comprised of income tax and consumption taxes.

Income tax was administered by the East African Tax Department under the East African High Commission which was formed in 1948.

The East African Income Tax (Management) Act 1952 combined three ordinances governing income tax in the East African countries and laid the basis for administration of income tax. Separate Income Tax Acts for the three East African countries were subsequently enacted in   1953. 

Prior to the introduction of income tax, Africans were subjected to hut and poll tax from 1901 while non-natives resident in Kenya were subjected to graduated personal taxation from 1933.

At independence, the Customs tariff ordinance, 1958 was in force. The colonial government had started charging customs tariff at the port of Mombasa under an agreement between Sultan Mazrui and the British in 1824. The tariff was slightly modified in 1922 to charge Duty at 30% on spirits, tobacco & perfumes, 10% duty on industrial commodities and 20% on other products. 

Excise Duty was collected under the Excise duty Agreements Ordinance. Duty was first introduced on beer in 1923 and on sugar, tea, cigarettes and tobacco in 1931. 

The mixed fortune 70s

In the decade after independence, the Kenyan economy boomed due in part to the green revolution and generous aid and grants from donors. 

The country was however affected by the oil shocks of 1973 and 1979. The government responded with tax changes to reduce the resulting fiscal deficits.

In response to the first oil shock, Kenya replaced the existing consumption taxes with a sales tax in the 1972/3.

The rate of corporate taxes was increased in 1973/4 from 40% to 45% for local companies and from 47.5% to 52 % for foreign companies.

The government introduced Capital Gains Tax on property and marketable securities in 1975 to increase tax revenue.

In addition to the oil shocks, the East African Community (EAC) collapsed in 1977, requiring public money to form corporations and buy out others.

The government responded to the collapse of the EAC and the 1979 oil shock by increasing sales taxes from 10 to 15 per cent and excise duties from 50% to 59%. Personal Income Tax was however decreased from 36% to 29% per cent in response to increasing tax competi­tion in East Africa.

The reformative 80s

In the early 1980s the Kenya economy was still reeling from the economic shocks of the 1970s.

Capital Gains Tax was suspended in 1985 to encourage foreign direct investment and development of the stock exchange.

In the second half of the decade, the country embarked on tax reform, which was part of the Structural Adjustment Programmes   in economic restructuring agreement between the Government of Kenya and the international financial institutions. The government adopted the Tax Modernization Programme (TMP) in 1986 and the Budget Rationalization Programme in 1987.

In the 1980s the personal tax rates were still high. For instance, the top marginal rate of taxation in 1986 and 1989 was 65% and 45%, respectively.

Excise Duty was specific and charged on domestically produced goods.

The dramatic 90s

Early 1990s was politically turbulent, characterised by the clamour for multi-party democracy in Kenya. 

The Berlin wall had fallen on 9 November 1989, signalling the demise of communism and end of the cold war. This marked the end of unconditional aid and grants from donors. In fact bilateral and multilateral donors suspended aid in 1991 to pressure the government to meet its commitments.

Despite the political intrigue, a number of administrative reforms were instituted in the 1990s.

VAT was introduced in 1990 to replace sales tax. VAT had a wider scope and included tax on services. On introduction of VAT, there were 9 rates of ranging from 0% to 150%, with a standard rate of 18%.

At the end of the decade, the VAT rates had been reduced to 4, ranging from 0% to 15%, with a standard rate of 15%.

The EPZs Act was enacted in 1990. The Act gave generous incentives to export oriented manufacturers. Among the incentives available to EPZs were Exemptions from VAT, WHT, Stamp Duties, Import Duties and a 10 year corporation tax holiday followed by CIT at a reduced rate of 25%.

The EPZs Act also provided for manufacture under bond. Manufacturers under bond were exempted from Duty and VAT on imported plant, equipment and raw materials. They were also entitled to 100% investment allowance on PPE. 

In 1991/2 Excise was changed from specific to ad valorem. The scope of excise was expanded to included imports, effectively turning Excise from a tax on domestic production to a tax on consumption.

In 1993, the economy was liberalised. Import licencing requirements and foreign exchange controls were abolished and export compensation was suspended.

The government tried, without much success to reform taxation of the agricultural and informal sectors. Presumptive tax was introduced in 1990, abolished in 1993, reintroduced in 1995 and abolished again in 2000.

A semi-autonomous Kenya Revenue Authority was incorporated in 1995.  KRA amalgamated 5 departments in Ministry of Finance namely: Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Sales Tax, Income Tax and Corporate Tax. Two years later KRA established a special station for large taxpayers (LTO). 

The transition 00s

The first decade of the 21^st century was a transition period. President Moi handed over power to President Kibaki’s NARC team in 2003, after 24 years in power.

The NARC administration put more emphasis in financing the budget through internally collected tax revenues.

The NARC administration accelerated the Tax Modernisation Programme, introducing new tax administration measures, including use of IT. 

The NARC government started with a “gift” of a tax amnesty in 2004. Taxpayers were allowed to declare and pay past taxes without suffering penalties and interest.

The government then introduced Electronic Tax Registers (ETR) in 2005 to enhance VAT Compliance. This move was met with countrywide opposition by traders before gradual acceptance. The SIMBA 2005 system for Customs declaration was also introduced in 2005.

The government gazetted Transfer Pricing regulations in 2006 to prescribe the methods of determining transfer prices between resident companies and related non-resident entities.

The reforms at KRA were largely successful. KRA was awarded the ISO 9001:2001 certification in 2007 and the ISO 9001:2008 certification in 2011.

To keep up with developments in the IT sector, the government introduced provisions for taxation of non-resident providers of bandwidth, satellite and radio communications. The government also prescribed new capital allowances on fibre optic cable and computer software.

Once again in 2006 the government sought to bring the informal sector into the tax net through Turnover Tax (ToT) and Advance Tax.

The government reverted to specific rates of Excise Duty in 2003/4. A hybrid system was adopted for cigarettes.

Regional integration proceeded fast in the decade. The EAC Treaty came into force in 2000. The Customs Union was launched in 2004 and the Common Market in 2010.

VAT standard rate was reduced from 18% at the turn of the decade to 16%. The 16% rate prevailed till the end of the decade. A special rate of 12% was charged on electricity and HFO.

Personal Income Tax brackets were reduced to 5 in number.

The new dawn 10s

The adoption of a new constitution in 2010 was a watershed in public finance management. The 2010 constitution laid down an elaborate framework for public finance management as well as entrenched the right to fair administrative process as a fundamental right.

Section 47 of the constitution entitles a taxpayer to an expeditious, efficient, lawful, reasonable and procedural fair administrative process. Taxpayers have a right to be given written reasons for actions that may affect their tax liabilities adversely.   

The constitution devolved some powers of taxation from the national government to the county governments. The national government was granted a monopoly in imposing income tax, value-added tax, customs duties and other duties on import and export goods and excise tax. The county governments may impose property rates, entertainment taxes and any other tax that may be authorized to impose by Parliament.

The new constitution abolished tax exemptions for public officers. The Income Tax Act, Customs and Excise Act and VAT Acts were amended to remove tax exemptions for the president and other public officers.

A new broad based VAT Act was enacted in 2013 to improve VAT administration and improve VAT tax yields.

In the present decade, the government has identified new sources of tax revenue including excise on mobile money transfer and tax on transfer of rights to oil prospecting blocks.  

KRA has continued with Tax Modernisation measures. The Medium Taxpayers Office (MTO) station, modelled along the lines of the LTO was introduced in 2010 to manage taxpayers making a turnover of KES 350-750 Million. 

KRA is rolling out an integrated system of the registration, filing of returns and payment of tax (iTax).

The government introduced the legal framework to enable KRA to co-operate with other revenue authorities and exchange information on tax revenue matters in 2012.

On tax dispute resolution, the government has introduced a single tribunal to replace the multiple tribunals for income tax and VAT. 

The future

In the 50 years since independence, Kenya has made progressive steps to reform public finance management and the tax system.  There have been notable improvements in the policy framework and tax administration processes.

Going forward, KRA should continue improving tax administration processes and aim at adopting international best practices.

The county governments have been granted taxing powers by the constitution. Most of the counties lack the capacity and expertise to administer tax systems. The national government should assist the county governments to develop capacity to administer taxes at the county level.

The government has largely failed at bringing the informal sector to taxation. Large taxpayers and people in formal employment account for most of the tax collections.  The country should explore economically efficient means of bringing the gray market to taxation.

Substantive taxation of land and wealth has been elusive since the colonial government tried to tax land by enacting the 1908 Crown Land Bill. There is a huge potential for tax revenue collection from property. The government should explore ways and means of taxing the sector.
    

Finally research suggests that tax incentive schemes introduced in the 1990s through the EPZs Act may be harming rather than helping tax collections. The government should reassess the incentives and if possible enact the Special Economic Zones Bill as soon as is practically possible.

by Starlings Muchiri

Visit our website